motherboards
Arctic
Arctic Cooling Products
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: ssds future looks bleak

  1. #1
    Core Member

    Status
    aryan51 is offline

    Last Online
    22-02-2019 @ 21:37
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    winnipeg, manitoba, canada
    Posts
    3,045
    CPU: intel 5960x
    M/B: rampage 5 extreame
    RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB DDR4 2800MHz Timings are 14-16-16-31 Voltage: 1.35V
    GPU: 2 evga 980ti aic 80% + kingpin
    • aryan51's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • Steiger Dynamics LEET
      • PSU:
      • evga super nova 1600 titanium
      • Cooling:
      • EK-Supremacy EVO Elite Edition - Intel 2011-3 EK-FC980 GTX Ti Classy KPE - Nickel EK-FC980 GTX Ti Classy KPE Backplate - Nickel EK Dual-Radiator 240mm EK Single-Radiator 120mm Pump & Resevoir EK-XRES 100 Revo D5 PWM (incl. pump) 4 Noctua NF-F12 industrialPPC 3000 PWM 120mm Fan sleeved in red
      • Monitor:
      • 55 ich 4k lg tv 240 mkz
      • OS:
      • windows 10 pro
      • Misc:
    Thanks
    928
    Thanked 134 Times in 127 Posts
    Points: 21,991, Level: 45
    Points: 21,991, Level: 45
    Level completed: 38%,
    Points required for next Level: 559
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 559
    Overall activity: 0%
    Overall activity: 0%

    Default ssds future looks bleak

    SAN JOSE -- As the circuitry of NAND flash-based, solid-state drives shrinks, performance drops precipitously -- meaning the technology could be doomed, according to new research.
    Speaking to about 500 attendees at the 10th Usenix Conference on File and Storage Technologies here this week, Laura Grupp, a graduate student at the University of California, San Diego, said that as NAND flash densities increase, so do issues such as read and write latency and data errors.
    While the density of SSDs grows and the cost per gigabyte shrinks, "everything else about them is poised to get worse," Grupp said.
    "This makes the future of SSDs cloudy: While the growing capacity of SSDs and high IOP rates will make them attractive for many applications, the reduction in performance that is necessary to increase capacity while keeping costs in check may make it difficult for SSDs to scale as a viable technology for some applications," Grupp, lead author of the study, wrote in a research paper.
    Grupp, along with Steven Swanson, director of UCSD's Non-Volatile Systems Laboratory, and John Davis of Microsoft Research, tested 45 different NAND flash chips that ranged in size from 72 nanometer (nm) circuitry to today's 25nm technology. The chips came from six vendors.
    The tests revealed that the program speed (write speed) for pages in a flash block suffered dramatic and predictable variations in latency. And, as the NAND flash wore out, error rates also varied widely between devices. Single-level cell (SLC) NAND held up the best in the tests, while multi-level cell (MLC), and in particular, triple-level cell (TLC) NAND, produced the worst results.
    The researchers took their empirical results and extrapolated them to the year 2024, when NAND flash development road maps show flash circuitry is expected to be only 6.5nm in size. At that time, read/write latency is expected to double in MLC flash and increase more than 2.5 times for TLC flash.
    In addition, bit error rates increased by a factor of more than three, according to the researchers. "We can either have capacity or performance," Grupp said.
    The researchers used PCIe-based flash cards with a channel speed of 400MBps based on the Open NAND Flash Interface (ONFI) specification and a standard 96 NAND flash dies, which is typical of SSDs.
    The researchers did not use specialized NAND flash controllers as are used by SSD vendors such as Intel, OCZ or Fusion-io. Instead their results were baseline and considered "optimistic" because they didn't include latency added through error correction or garbage collection algorithms.
    Because SSDs have no moving parts, the time needed to write and read data is more than 100 times faster than that of hard disk drives that use read-write heads on actuator arms to find data on a spinning platter. But as NAND flash circuitry continues to shrink in size, the performance gap with hard disk drives will become more narrow, Grupp said.
    By the time NAND flash shrinks from 25nm today to 6.5nm in 2024, SSDs based on TLC flash will sport as much as 16TB of capacity and MLC flash SSDs will have 4TB, Grupp said.
    Considering the diminishing returns on performance versus capacity, Grupp said, "it's not going to be viable to go past 6.5nm ... 2024 is the end."


    Read and write latencies related to SSD density and type. (Source: UCSD Department of Computer Science and Engineering)
    However, even with TLC flash at 6.5nm, Grupp calculates that SSDs will continue to outperform hard disk drives on throughput, 32,000 IOPS to 200 IOPS, respectively.
    NAND flash memory chips are used to build solid-state drives (flash storage in a hard drive form factor) and PCIe-based flash cards. Over the past six years or so, the transistor size of NAND flash chips has shrunk from 72nm to 25nm, which allows more data to be stored with the same number of flash dies.
    But as the size of the circuitry diminishes, so do the walls of cells that hold the electrons, which in turn represent bits of data. As cell walls thin out, electrons leak through and create data errors, which requires additional error correction code.
    The first SSDs only stored 1 bit of data per NAND flash cell, which is known as SLC flash. Next came MLC flash, which offered two bits per cell. Most recently, vendors have begun producing triple-level cell (TLC) flash, which stores three bits of data per cell. The most common NAND flash remains MLC, but that's expected to change as vendors strive to produce higher capacity SSDs in order to compete with hard disk drive capacities.
    Flash memory, however, wears out over time as data is marked for deletion and moved and new data is written in a process known as a program-erase cycle (P/E cycle). Special firmware in today's drive controllers more evenly spreads data throughout the drive to give the media greater endurance, but ultimately, NAND flash has a finite number of P/E cycles.


    Read and write MBps (bandwidth) decreases with density and capacity. (Source: UCSD Department of Computer Science and Engineering)
    SLC flash has the highest reliability and resiliency, with 50,000 to 100,000 program/erase (P/E) cycles. MLC NAND can sustain 5,000 to 10,000 erase cycles. TLC NAND has the lowest endurance, with 1,000 P/E cycles to as few as 500 P/E cycles, the researchers found.
    "It's a pretty dramatic decline," Grupp said. "[People] are used to working with technology that continues to just get better, but with NAND flash we're going to be facing trade-offs as it evolves."
    You Raise The Blade You Make The Change


  2. #2
    Banned

    Status
    Drdeath is offline

    Last Online
    02-07-2013 @ 02:04
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chicago Burbs
    Posts
    8,549
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 5GHz
    M/B: ASROCK X79 Extreme 6
    RAM: 16G G.Skill Trident 2400MHz
    GPU: 2 x Radeon 2G 7970 Liquid cooled
    • Drdeath's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • Phobya CooliT TestBennch
      • PSU:
      • Nexus 1100W
      • Cooling:
      • Custom water. Apogee XT Rev 1, Thermachill TA120.3 plus 120.2, Swiftec Micro res, MCP655
      • Sound:
      • OB
      • Monitor:
      • Viewsonic 27"
      • OS:
      • Win7 64bit
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 1,022 Times in 880 Posts
    Points: 28,339, Level: 51
    Points: 28,339, Level: 51
    Level completed: 72%,
    Points required for next Level: 311
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 311
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Overall activity: 99.9%

    Default Re: ssds future looks bleak

    These guys are high. 2024 is a long way off and technology evolves. Nothing wrong with a cross between performance and size of a SSD.

  3. #3
    Core Member

    Status
    aryan51 is offline

    Last Online
    22-02-2019 @ 21:37
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    winnipeg, manitoba, canada
    Posts
    3,045
    CPU: intel 5960x
    M/B: rampage 5 extreame
    RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB DDR4 2800MHz Timings are 14-16-16-31 Voltage: 1.35V
    GPU: 2 evga 980ti aic 80% + kingpin
    • aryan51's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • Steiger Dynamics LEET
      • PSU:
      • evga super nova 1600 titanium
      • Cooling:
      • EK-Supremacy EVO Elite Edition - Intel 2011-3 EK-FC980 GTX Ti Classy KPE - Nickel EK-FC980 GTX Ti Classy KPE Backplate - Nickel EK Dual-Radiator 240mm EK Single-Radiator 120mm Pump & Resevoir EK-XRES 100 Revo D5 PWM (incl. pump) 4 Noctua NF-F12 industrialPPC 3000 PWM 120mm Fan sleeved in red
      • Monitor:
      • 55 ich 4k lg tv 240 mkz
      • OS:
      • windows 10 pro
      • Misc:
    Thanks
    928
    Thanked 134 Times in 127 Posts
    Points: 21,991, Level: 45
    Points: 21,991, Level: 45
    Level completed: 38%,
    Points required for next Level: 559
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 559
    Overall activity: 0%
    Overall activity: 0%

    Default Re: ssds future looks bleak

    Quote Originally Posted by Drdeath View Post
    These guys are high. 2024 is a long way off and technology evolves. Nothing wrong with a cross between performance and size of a SSD.
    I THOUGHT SO TO but thought i would share
    You Raise The Blade You Make The Change


  4. #4
    Core Member

    Status
    SamCR3 is offline

    Last Online
    10-02-2019 @ 11:19
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Seattle, Washington USA
    Posts
    4,222
    CPU: AMD FX-8350 @ 4.6Ghz
    M/B: Asus Crosshair V Formula
    RAM: 16GB Corsair Dominator GT 1866MHz (9-10-9-27)
    GPU: XFX HD 7970 Black Edition 3GB and Diamond HD 7970 3GB both @ 1125/1575MHz
    • SamCR3's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • NZXT Switch 810
      • PSU:
      • OCZ Fatal1ty 1000 Watt
      • Cooling:
      • XSPC RayStorm CPU Block, XSPC X20 750 Pump/Res, CoolIt 360MM Rad. w/6 x Noctua NF-F12 PWM Fans (Push/Pull) and PrimoFlex Pro LRT UV Red Tubing; 5 x 140 MM Bitfenx Spectre Pro Red LED Fans on NZXT Sentry Mix Fan Controller
      • Sound:
      • SupremeFX X-Fi 2
      • Monitor:
      • 1 x Samsung SyncMaster SA350H 27 in.
      • OS:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
      • Misc:
      • CM Storm Trigger Mechanical Keyboard; CM Storm Sentinel Zero-G Gaming Mouse; Logitech z523 2.1 Speaker System; Logitech 600 Desktop Microphone
    Thanks
    867
    Thanked 430 Times in 386 Posts
    Points: 24,819, Level: 48
    Points: 24,819, Level: 48
    Level completed: 27%,
    Points required for next Level: 731
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 731
    Overall activity: 0%
    Overall activity: 0%

    Default Re: ssds future looks bleak

    In my experience, grad students tend to over-think stuff. It is an interesting article though.
    2nd Rig: AMD FX-8120; Corsair H105 ; Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3; 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 1600MHz; 2 x PowerColor HD 7870 Myst. Ed. (Tahiti LE); Fractal Design Arc XL; SeaSonic X Series 850W
    3rd Rig: AMD A6-3650; Asetek 550LC; Asus F1A75-M Pro; 8GB Kingston HyperX; XFX HD 6670 1GB GDDR5; Antec 300; Thermaltake TR2 650W

  5. #5
    Regular Member

    Status
    Steve is offline

    Last Online
    15-04-2016 @ 20:16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,450
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 218 Times in 192 Posts
    Points: 7,547, Level: 25
    Points: 7,547, Level: 25
    Level completed: 99%,
    Points required for next Level: 3
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 3
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Overall activity: 28.0%

    Default Re: ssds future looks bleak

    Waiting to hear Jon's comments on this.........

  6. #6
    Core Member

    Status
    PC_User is offline

    Last Online
    29-05-2013 @ 15:59
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    433
    CPU: i5 2500K @4.8ghz
    M/B: Gigabyte P67-UD5-B3
    RAM: G.Skill RipjawX 1866mhz
    GPU: SLI- MSI GTX 560ti/TFII/OC edition
    • PC_User's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • Tribal_fish mod
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X1050
      • Cooling:
      • Phanteks PH-TC14PE_RD w/ Prolimatech PRO-RV14LED 140mm Red LED fans x2
      • Sound:
      • OB
      • Monitor:
      • HP 2710 x2
      • OS:
      • W7 64
      • Misc:
      • NighthawkX8 Red LEDs Cherry Browns / Mionix Naos 5000 Mouse
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 45 Times in 37 Posts
    Points: 2,532, Level: 14
    Points: 2,532, Level: 14
    Level completed: 28%,
    Points required for next Level: 218
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 218
    Overall activity: 0%
    Overall activity: 0%

    Default Re: ssds future looks bleak

    yea OCZ caused lots of uproar last year when the was selling smaller 25nm NAND and not listing it in the specs that said it was the 32nm they ended up quickly replacing a ton of SSDs for free it was a big mess on the forums.

  7. #7
    Core Member

    Status
    Irocing is offline

    Last Online
    19-08-2012 @ 23:32
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Arizona (Area 52)
    Posts
    1,755
    CPU: i7 930 Lapped 4.51@1.42 HT ON
    M/B: Asus P6X58D-E
    RAM: Corsair Dominator 6gig 3x2 1600@1723
    GPU: Sapphire 7970 OC Edition 1275/1700/1.200V
    • Irocing's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • CM 690 II Advanced (Swiss cheezed)
      • PSU:
      • Coolmaster 850 82A Modular
      • Cooling:
      • EK-XT Micro-Rez XSPC 240 X 2 + XSPC 120 MCP 355 pump-600.5
      • Sound:
      • CL SB Titanium/ Bose 2.1
      • Monitor:
      • Samsung 26- 1920x1200
      • OS:
      • Win 7 SP1 HE 64bit
      • Misc:
      • Lamptron FC-2 Lamptron 5 Pole-5v-12v 9- Hi Speed Scythes thru controller Keyboard Logiteck G-15 M4 128g Boot WD 640 Sata III Storage
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 139 Times in 124 Posts
    Points: 5,047, Level: 20
    Points: 5,047, Level: 20
    Level completed: 99%,
    Points required for next Level: 3
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 3
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Overall activity: 25.0%

    Default Re: ssds future looks bleak

    Okay Niel,

    Splain

    Don't want to throw my 120 in the trash in a couple years.

    Later

Remove Ads

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. The future of gaming chassis HAF 912
    By News Team in forum Hardware News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-09-2010, 12:41
  2. Speculation on the future of gpu's.
    By jayfunk in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-12-2009, 10:40
  3. Back to the Future.
    By Lil' Dead in forum PC Games
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-11-2009, 02:39
  4. Future Build, what you think?
    By Boominthetrunk in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-03-2009, 22:35
  5. AMD positive about the future
    By News Team in forum Hardware News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-05-2008, 04:50

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search tags.
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread