![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
CPU: AMD FX 8350 |
M/B: ASUS CROSSHAIR V Formula |
RAM: 16 gig Corsair Vengence 9- 9- 9 -27 12800 1600 mhz |
GPU: Gigabyte R9 270X Windforce |
|
AMD’s Kaveri APU is upon us, and the technology is, depending on your perspective, pretty impressive. Kaveri utilizes substantially updated Steamroller x86 cores, offering up to 20% better IPC, but the selling point is the new GPU half and how it interacts with the CPU. Kaveri’s graphics cores utilize the most recent version of their GCN architecture, as found on their top of the line Radeon R9 290X. That’s before even taking into account AMD’s heterogenous system architecture, which completely unifies the system memory space between the CPU and GPU. Kaveri is, at least technologically, a very big dea
Blog - AMD Kaveri A10-7850K: From DDR3-1600 to DDR3-2400
CPU: i7 3970x @ 5.0GHz |
M/B: Rampage IV Black Edition |
RAM: Kingston HuperX Beast @2400MHz (64GB) |
GPU: 2SLI EVGA GTX 780 + EK WB |
|
Very well explained, as I always said difference between 1600 and 1866 is relatively big, but between 1866 and 2133/2400 is practically null.
Always look beyond the limits...
CPU: Intel Core i7 - 4770K |
M/B: MSI Z87 MPOWER |
RAM: 32 GB DDR3 2400 G.SKILL SNIPER |
GPU: 2X- EVGA GFORCE GTX 960 4GB FTW |
|
Great read and very well explained
CPU: AMD FX-8150 | 4.7GHz |
M/B: ASUS | Sabertooth 990FX TUF Rev.1 |
RAM: 2 x 4GB | Corsair | Vengeance1600 | 9-9-9-24 1T |
GPU: EVGA | GTX 770 ACX SC | 2GB | Core-1176MHz | Mem-1818MHz | Boost-1228Mhz |
|
Interesting article, nice and informative.
CPU: AMD FX 8150 8 Core |
M/B: ASUS Sabertooth 990FX |
RAM: 8gb GSkill DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 |
GPU: EVGA GTX 550Ti |
|
CPU: Intel i7-5820k |
M/B: ASRock X99 WS |
RAM: 32GB Crucial DDR4 2133 |
GPU: 2 R9-290s Xfire |
|
If you compare it in that step format then yes its null. But think about how people actually use memory. They dont buy 1600, then 1866 then 2133 then 2400. So it should be compared as if 1600 is baseline cheap ddr3 memory. 1600 vs 1866 1600 vs 2133 1600 vs 2400. So then you check your percentage gains as show in the last chart. So you would gain 21% on average if you go with 2400 vs cheap 1600. Vs a 14% gain with 2133. That 7% for a few more $$ isnt null. Just my thoughts.
"If you got it, Build it"
A+ Certified. Dell, Lenovo, HP, Lexmarks, Xerox, Panasonic and NEC Certified ASP.
CPU: i7 3970x @ 5.0GHz |
M/B: Rampage IV Black Edition |
RAM: Kingston HuperX Beast @2400MHz (64GB) |
GPU: 2SLI EVGA GTX 780 + EK WB |
|
Always look beyond the limits...
CPU: AMD A 10-5800K Trinity 4.5 |
M/B: ECS A85F2-A Golden |
RAM: 16G Crucial Blaxtix 1866mzh |
GPU: 2 Saphirre 7770 Vapor X 1G 1150/1400 |
|
That is a very good answer Smik! cause i plan on using my same memory when i get a new board!