motherboards
Arctic
Arctic Cooling Products
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Whats more accurate: TAT or Core Temp 98.1?

  1. #1
    Regular Member

    Status
    say what is offline

    Last Online
    05-02-2017 @ 18:13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,452
    CPU: i7-4790k @ 4.7
    M/B: Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5
    RAM: 16 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z 2400MHz @stock timings
    GPU: Gigabyte GTX 1080
    • say what's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF XB Evo
      • PSU:
      • Evga 750 Something or another, Its full modular
      • Cooling:
      • Water
      • Monitor:
      • Acer 24 inch 144 Hz
      • OS:
      • Windows 10
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 48 Times in 46 Posts
    Points: 15,142, Level: 37
    Points: 15,142, Level: 37
    Level completed: 37%,
    Points required for next Level: 508
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 508
    Overall activity: 56.0%
    Overall activity: 56.0%

    Default Whats more accurate: TAT or Core Temp 98.1?



    i was wondering if i should be scared and trust Core Temp, or not be scared and trust TAT is right


    **edit** i just noticed....i don't have a Pentium M...with that being said...im not trusting TAT
    Last edited by say what; 03-05-2008 at 09:22.
    What?

  2. #2
    Regular Member

    Status
    smith is offline

    Last Online
    29-03-2010 @ 18:40
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    991
    CPU: E6600 at 3.6ghz
    M/B: Maximus Formula SE
    RAM: mushkin redline xp2-8000 @ 960mhz 4-4-4-8 1T
    GPU: HIS 4870 Xfire 830/1000
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Points: 5,855, Level: 22
    Points: 5,855, Level: 22
    Level completed: 61%,
    Points required for next Level: 195
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 195
    Overall activity: 76.0%
    Overall activity: 76.0%

    Default

    from what ive seen core temp is the better of the two. btw is that idle or load?

  3. #3
    Regular Member

    Status
    say what is offline

    Last Online
    05-02-2017 @ 18:13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,452
    CPU: i7-4790k @ 4.7
    M/B: Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5
    RAM: 16 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z 2400MHz @stock timings
    GPU: Gigabyte GTX 1080
    • say what's Full Spec's
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF XB Evo
      • PSU:
      • Evga 750 Something or another, Its full modular
      • Cooling:
      • Water
      • Monitor:
      • Acer 24 inch 144 Hz
      • OS:
      • Windows 10
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 48 Times in 46 Posts
    Points: 15,142, Level: 37
    Points: 15,142, Level: 37
    Level completed: 37%,
    Points required for next Level: 508
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 508
    Overall activity: 56.0%
    Overall activity: 56.0%

    Default

    idle pretty much, core 1 is at 17% and core 0 is 2%
    What?

  4. #4
    Regular Member

    Status
    Ciro is offline

    Last Online
    17-10-2019 @ 21:13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    670
    CPU: P4 3.4Ghz 'Northy' HT
    M/B: Asrock P4i65G (865G)
    RAM: 1GB Kingston PC-3200
    GPU: Leadtek 7600GT AGP
    • Ciro's Full Spec's
      • Cooling:
      • Thermaltake Cyclo HDD Cooler -- Bluegears B-Cool 120mm Case Fan -- Zalman VF700-Cu GPU cooler -- Arctic Silver 5 thermal compound
      • Sound:
      • Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
      • OS:
      • Win XP Pro SP3
      • Misc:
      • Eee PC 1000H -- Razer Diamondback Plasma LE -- Flexiglow Gamepad -- Microsoft Digital Media Pro keyboard -- Logitech X-620 6.1 speakers --
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Points: 16,887, Level: 39
    Points: 16,887, Level: 39
    Level completed: 55%,
    Points required for next Level: 363
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 363
    Overall activity: 0%
    Overall activity: 0%

    Default

    Both these programs read their temps from internal diodes within each core, so temps will always be reported hotter than programs like Speedfan (which isn't as accurate, especially the older versions).

    Considering that TAT doesn't correctly recognize your CPU, I wouldn't trust it either (oll, and the fact that The Coolest is probably reading :rolleyes
    Last edited by Ciro; 03-05-2008 at 23:08.

Remove Ads

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 274
    Last Post: 24-08-2019, 19:28
  2. Core Temp, a great little app for monitoring core temps
    By Jameson in forum General Hardware
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 13-08-2012, 20:11
  3. Core Temp weirdness.
    By zerobit in forum Cooling
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 31-01-2011, 01:49
  4. Core Temp program
    By ballista in forum General Software
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-10-2006, 15:24

Search tags for this page

tat core temperature
,

temp 98.1

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread